Friday, September 25, 2009

Value model: 2D or 3D?











Which number of dimensions do you prefer? The value concepts have been scaled in 2D so the relative size of circles relates to the relative frequency of the value concepts in the transcript data (first 2000 data points). In the 3D graph, the size of the spheres relative to each other shows relative frequency of concepts to each other, and to the unit cube (which shows 100%). Which do you prefer? I think the 2D version is simpler but less evocative. The 2D version shows a greater disparity between the central value concept and the lesser non-core concepts. Both are accurate in their own degree of dimensions.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

After looking over a handful of the blog articles on your
web page, I seriously appreciate your way of blogging.
I saved it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back in the near future.
Take a look at my web site as well and tell me your
opinion.

my weblog - RandalHMcvay

Anonymous said...

Hi there! This article could not be written any better!
Looking at this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
He always kept talking about this. I will forward this post to him.
Pretty sure he's going to have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!


Feel free to visit my web site - JaysonNGalo