Monday, February 18, 2019

The value of non-profit: Dryad and California Digital Library

Workshop: Accelerating Data Publication: new models for research institutions. Melbourne 8 Feb 19.

I attended a workshop the other day, where John Chodacki, Director, UC Curation Center, California Digital Library, pitched an idea for a Data Repository, run by the non-profit organisation, Dryad. Dryad, accepts researcher's data, for a $600USD processing fee, checks the data description, and holds the data long-term to support a publication related to the data. Here are the slides and Etherpad. Per Dryad, the charge per publication is $120USD plus a storage fee if over 20Gb data ($50 per 10Gb). So a $600 total fee would be for storing about 100Gb of files. This fee is waived, upon request, for researchers from lower  - middle income countries (per World Bank definitions).

John had another idea, for how to use Dryad, for his University of California (UC) researchers. UC had been considering building their own repository from scratch, but thought their funds might be better spent building on top of an existing platform - where researchers were already depositing their data. Apparently 90,000 researchers (Slide 55) already have deposited data at Dryad, and Dryad provide data deposit for over 900 academic journals (Slide 55).

John's idea was to use Dryad as an Institutional service, where the University could pay an annual fee, then their researchers would no longer need to pay a per article data deposit fee. Talks with Dryad began, and they agreed to seek support of other institutions to promote the new service. Fees were agreed on a sliding scale, where a big Institution would pay more (about $13,000 USD per year) and a smaller Institution would pay less (about $3,000 USD per year).

At the workshop I attended, there were representatives from a number of Australian Universities and research organisations; RMIT, Deakin, Victoria University, CSIRO, University of Sydney, University of New South Wales, Queensland University of Technology, Aarnet, Monash University, plus myself and my colleagues from ARDC, the Australian Research Data Commons. In a final quiz item, the attendees said they were interested in the new service, but that they were not the ones to sign off on that type of purchase. It raised the question of what was the next steps. How could Australian institutions contribute to interest in this new idea for a repository? This blog post was one of those next steps.

There were a number of obvious benefits:
- paying a non-profit community run organisation, rather than a commercial provider, so it should be a little cheaper
- community can drive what the system looks like, and the functions can be responsive to community needs
- using a system that already has a lot of researcher users (over 60,000), and journal integration.
- using a trusted system (certified with CoreTrustSeal recognised certification).

But there were some obvious challenges:
- if you were to use this system, how would we transition from our current system to this new system?
- would there be local support in Australia to help users, and help Institutions make a business case, and help researchers use the Dryad system?

There were a number of questions raised:
- where would the data be stored? In the US. But a copy could be kept locally.
- what about sensitive data, which has to be stored in Australia (or an equivalently privacy-protected jurisdiction ie not the US which has weaker privacy rules)? Dryad doesn't accept sensitive data, so where the data is stored should not be an issue.
- what size data can be sent to Dryad? (As a file up to 10Gb; and from a URL up to 100Gb)
- can we use specific data description types (vocabularies)? Should be fine, John said.
- can we get descriptions of data belonging to our Institutions, back into institutional systems? Contact Dryad for discussion.
- have CDL/Dryad talked to the Australian infrastructure provider, QCIF, who manages the RedBox repository? or Figshare? about how to create a win-win amongst the various repository providers? No, but there is enough room in the ecosystem to allow different repositories to service different users/
- were there any plans to have people in Australian to promote the services and educate institutions and users about the benefits of the system, like Figshare's sales team? Not at this stage.

Later that same day, I was at another event, and spoke to Natalie Meyers, University of Notre Dame, who is an ambassador for the Center for Open Science and interested in having more integrations with the Open Science Framework (OSF). She wondered if by engaging a larger community to join a Dryad Institutional service, there might be incentive to enhance the Dryad API to make it more consumable and its endpoints more interoperable with other open science platforms like OSF? John had mentioned that software development work (DaSH, was it called?) that CDL had wanted to build on top of Dryad, would provide some of the new institutional functionality.

So, it is obvious that the community needs to keep talking about what to do next, what questions are still left unanswered, and how to sell the idea to the money people at your institution. That will require at least in the beginning, glossy flyers, and ultimately a business case to assess the costs and benefits. See also the Dryad blogpost (May '18) announcing the partnership with CDL (follow up Oct '18 post).

If you have any questions, please post them in the comments section below and I will send them along to John (john.chodacki - at- ucop.edu) to answer.

NB: Where I work at ARDC, we have a policy of vendor neutrality, so this post should not be read as an assessment of the value of the CDL/Dryad service, but does seek to point out the many issues to be wrestled with in making a value assessment.

Thursday, December 6, 2018

What is new in Value (2013 - 2018)? How to do a Literature review as an Open Researcher

I am writing an update to my literature review, now that I have published v1 of The Little Book of Value. But this is the first literature review I am writing as an Open Researcher. So I am considering how do I write this as an open process. Some options:
LBOV
The Little Book of Value: figshare.
  • Endnote - too proprietary. Sharable. I doubt it. 
  • Onenote - Microsoft. Ick! Too complicated. 
 Now I am thinking I will use a Google Doc, with sections:
  • Authors 
  • Journals 
  • Papers 
  • Quotes 
So my research question is: what is new in value theory (2013 - 2018). Let's begin. Will update this post with my progress.

I posted a request to the Australia/NZ Open Research Slack channel (ANZORN) and had responses:
  • Zotero - "a free, easy-to-use tool to help you collect, organize, cite, and share research" ,but it is a download to desktop tool.Ugh! Where is the work in the open? Also has Zbib for a quick bibliography from DOI.
  • google doc (view/comment only): sharable, unstructured, public, free, simple. See the Literature Review in progress. Current paper count: 40. Current Author search: Gronroos, Vargo and Lusch, Akaka. Current Journals: Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Industrial Marketing Management, Marketing Theory, MIS Quarterly, Journal of Creating Value (and more) plus books.
Will update here as progress continues. See the Google Doc for live updates.
Update 1 (24.1.19): Summary of Value Lit. published as an update in The Little Book of Value (version 3).
Significant new literature noted: Mazzucato, M. (2018). The Value of Everything. Includes an economic history of value theory including focus on land (physiocrats), labour (Classical, Adam Smith, Ricardo, Marx ie industrial revolution), trade (mercantilists). Focus on productive and unproductive growth - making and taking.

See also a network visualisation of Innovation and Value creation at kumu.io (opens full page), and embedded below. On a bigger screen you can choose between two views: - Innovation and value creation - thinkers (an overview of the literature review in my PhD 2012) - Value theory of innovation (the PhD model). NB: After clicking on a node, click top-right corner to close description.

Tuesday, April 3, 2018

Is there a business case for the National Broadband Network?

I made a model to calculate the value of NBN for the Business Case Inquiry, using an online calculator(JavaScript) called an Observable Notebook.
See introduction to Observable Notebooks at: https://beta.observablehq.com/@mbostock/five-minute-introduction

I had a class in Feb at Melb Uni which showed these HTML sliders controlling the colour of a box; https://beta.observablehq.com/@maegul/basic-html-and-viewof-play and I thought it would be cool if you could make a model of NBN's finances and use a bunch of sliders to check out various scenarios eg

  • people leave NBN for mobile
  • people leave/stay with FTTN because too slow/good enough
  • when to replace FTTN with FTTC/FTTP (I ended up using two sliders. One to put $$$ aside to replace FTTN, as % of cash profit. The other is what to replace FTTN with, FTTC or FTTP or mix.)
So I wondered with a bunch of sliders, say six, could you model 100M possible scenarios.

As I say in my submission:
This submission introduces an online model which describes financial scenarios of NBN’s business over the next 20 years; including replacing FTTN with FTTC/FTTP, repaying debt, upgrading to gigabit services and the potential fallout of not replacing FTTN, to calculate NBN’s financial value under these different possible futures.

Figure 1. NBN Cashflow graph and four sliders.

Here the Observable model is - NBN Financials from 2021 on. The model rates a Base Case value of NBN at $31B. https://beta.observablehq.com/@areff2000/nbn-financials-from-2021-on-v5a-verbose-off

I was so rushed getting it finished, and 5pp summary(see figshare link) for NBN inquiry, didn’t think to share here, at Whirlpool, for comment. I should have.

Here is the link to the version with explanations; https://beta.observablehq.com/@areff2000/nbn-financials-from-2021-v5-on

Key findings of the model

  • NBN cash profit(EBITDA) after 2021 $2.44B per year
  • can afford to replace FTTN In 6-8 yrs depending on FTTC/FTTP, if not repaying debt
  • each loss 1% of customers worth $1B in NBN value
  • gigabit services can add $20B to NBN value
  • FTTN replacement pays for itself if 30% of FTTN users upgrade to gigabit
  • customer satisfaction has big impact on NBN value
  • where gigabit costs 2* avg ARPU...but higher margin...
  • Model suggests NBN will have enough $$$ to replace FTTN, if don’t have to repay debt urgently. Otherwise run into FTTN end of life and possible loss of customers...
Disclaimer; model had no tax, interest, inflation, price rises, but was built in four weeks, so there you go. The next thing I would add would be interest on debt, and a slider for the rate, to add a time dimension/penalty to the replacement of FTTN.

Any comments, as usual, appreciated.
rf


Links:
Twitter mention: https://twitter.com/valuemgmt/status/979110826643660800?s=21

Thursday, February 8, 2018

Why walk on the footpath when you can walk on the grass? ...a value choice...

Walking to the train this morning, I noticed the long grass verge next to the footpath, as if for the first time. They are upgrading the train near my house, so for the last three months I have had to walk for ten minutes to the 2nd closest train station. It is summer here, and so I had my slip on shoes on to keep cool.

On a whim, I took my shoes off, and walked on the grass instead of the footpath. My 900m walking commute suddenly became a walk in the park. #shoesOff The footpath in bare feet seemed alien and unfriendly. The grass, while uneven and coarse, I realised was gently massaging my feet.

I realised how dull my feet felt in shoes on pavement. While barefoot on grass, I felt more alive, more in touch with nature, more normal.

Then a young woman, headphones on, frightened me as she scooted past on the footpath, walking briskly. Left Right Left Right, she was soon gone up the road, as I ambled along enjoying the tickle of the grass on my soles.

Aha. I was having a value moment. In that choice between grass and concrete, between fast and slow, between smooth and bumpy, we were each finding our value. Hers was quick and smooth and efficient, while mine was bumpy, slow and (like an Aussie wit) laconical. Her value was functional while mine was pleasureable. Hers was a means to an end, while mine was an end in itself.

Monday, I will probably be scooting down the footpath, on a cooler day, socks and shoes on.

Value is thus an individual choice, in a perceived context, between value dimensions eg function vs pleasure, each according to their current momentary needs. That choice for me happened in an instant today, but not occurred to me over the previous three months.

Thursday, February 16, 2017

What do consumers value in smartphones?

As part of the Little Book of Value (#LBOV), I am writing a number of case studies, including:

- Value of smartphones - see draft case here
- Value of NBN; national infrastructure
- Value of new products (denting the universe); Apple and iPhone

The #LBOV is a collaborative writing project at Github, but the pics need to be on a URL, so I will post the pics here for linking from Github. Please add you Value stories as a link to this post, or other #LBOV posts on this blog.

Here are the images of what consumers valued in their smartphones. All images CC-BY.
Please also refer to my Phd at Ferrers (2013), full reference at: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.680002.



Fig 1. What do consumers value in smartphones? A small sample.


Fig 2. Count of value elements by consumer - the PhD sample.


Fig 3. Comparing value dimensions across consumers - the PhD sample


Fig 4. Theoretical saturation - Value Concepts - the PhD sample


Wednesday, February 1, 2017

NBN coming to Vic 3166 - I made a map. Here's how.

See the map (v.1) I made (with 40 datapoints) at:
https://twitter.com/ValueMgmt/status/827009730870521856 
I made a (v.2) map (with 60 datapoints) at:
https://t.co/zd8F86Z9am

Method

If you want to repeat this for your area, here's how I did it.

Getting Started

  • Lat/Long: I use a Mac, and its Map program provides an easy way to turn an address into a Lat Long. You can also use maps.google.com.
  • Spreadsheet. I used a Google Sheet. You can also load data into excel (csv) and drop into Google Maps.
  • Google Maps. You need a Google login for this.

Making the Map

  1. Create Google Sheet (or spreadsheet) with four columns
  2. A. Address B.Lat C.Long D. NBN Status – in rollout (yes/no)
  3. Get the Lat Long. In Apple Maps, pick an address, Drop a pin = Right Click. Click (i). Copy address into Column A. Copy Lat/ Long in Col B,C. Alternatively, in Google Maps, right click What's here to get the Lat/Long of any point. You can also find a Lat/Long with Google Maps API; by inserting and address into: http://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/json?address=ADDR where ADDR = 12carlislecrescent,hughesdale,vic eg Link

  4. Paste address into NBN map checker:
  5. http://www.nbnco.com.au/connect-home-or-business/check-your-address.html
    This gives rollout status. In Hughesdale it was either (1) (Available: Apr – Jun) = yes or (2) (Still finalising) = no.

  6. Paste Address status (yes/no) into Col. D.
  7. Gather a list of addresses you want to map... I did about 25 before I made a map. Then the map helped pick where to check next.
  8. Go to Google Maps: https://www.google.com.au/maps/
  9. -> Menu -> Your places -> Maps -> Create Map -> Add Layer -> select Google Sheet -> indicate Lat/Long fields -> indicate NBN Status: Yes/No field
    This places all your address points on a map.
    Add a title and description to explain what area you are mapping.

  10. Colour code the points into different colours for NBN Status: Yes/No.
  11. Select Layer -> Uniform Style -> Uniform Style -> Style by Data Column -> Col D. (NBN Status).

  12. When you add new data to your spreadsheet, you need to (but maybe there is an easier way) readd the layer: Add layer -> select Google Sheet i.e. repeat Step 6,7. Delete the old layer: Choose layer -> layer options (three vertical dots) -> delete this layer.
  13. Add polygon to show the boundary of rollout for the region.
  14. Post to Whirlpool / Twitter for comments: Maps -> Share -> Change: anyone with the link can View – copy/paste URL

  15. Enjoy!

Friday, January 27, 2017

The Little Book of Value

I am writing a 75 page book on Value to publish by the end of this year (2017).


  • Will be $10 for the plain black and white text copy (eBook at Amazon).
  • Will be $20 for the colourful eBook, with videos, photos, exercises and more.
  • Will be free for the Community Version, where you earn a copy by contributing your value stories.


If you want to be part of the writing process, either:

- comment below with your email, and tell me "what do you value?", or
- make a three minute video and post the link below to the question "what does value mean to you"
- the writing process will be a public community exercise at Github.

By posting, you agree your content can be included (royalty free) in the above books. All included entries will earn the author, 10 copies of the book, so be sure to leave your email.

Add your comments to the wiki or fork the repository. Add your questions about value either in comments below or at Github.

You can see the outline at Github.

Happy New Rooster Year!!